WSIT Features of Metro 1.5 FCS Status Notes
Last Modified : $Date: 2010-10-21 14:23:20 $ by $Author: snajper $
Updated: April 20, 2008
Introduction
This document provides a list of
- new features,
- bugs fixed,
- known issues,
- what is not implemented
This document covers the following topics:
- High Availability, JDK support, GF version, etc.
- Metadata Exchange Status
- Data Binding Status
- Reliable Messaging Status
- Security Status
- Secure Conversation Status
- Trust Status
- Coordination/Atomic Transactions Status
- NetBeans WSIT Module Status
- Policy Status
- Security Policy Status
- SOAP/TCP Status
High Availability, JDK support, GF version, etc.
Updated: April 20, 2009
- High availability: this release has not implemented nor tested high availability features (e.g., failover, load-balancing). The base JAX-WS stack might work in HA situations in clusters. We know that our reliable messaging and secure conversation implementations have state that is not saved and therefore will not survive a process or machine failure.
- JDK support: Metro has been tested with Sun's JDK and with IBM's AIX JDK. Metro should work in any Servlet 2.4 compliant web-container if that web container is using Sun's JDK. Metro will work with GlassFish Update Release 1 and IBM's AIX JDK. Certain security features depend on GlassFish supplied classes when using IBM's AIX JDK so Metro won't work on non-Sun JDK's or non-IBM/AIX+Glassfish in certain scenarios.
- Source code: The NetBeans project setup that is delivered with the source code has a minor issue. See the bug description for details how to resolve the issue: nbproject for rt build depends on missing xmldsig.jar
- Maven: The artifact ID of the parent POM for webservices-rt and webservices-tools was changed to ensure that it does not clash with the POM used for the Metro GlassFish V3 OSGi bundles. See this issue.
Metadata Exchange Status
Updated: Apr 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
- 486 - MS->Sun interop using MEX:WS-Metadata Exchange Error
- 491 - MEX doesn't work throwing com.sun.xml.ws.server.UnsupportedMediaException
- 548 - Problem with URI scheme when using MEX for metadata retrieval with 'svcutil.exe'
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Server-side support of MEX is only officially supported in scenarios involving WS-Trust STS (Secure Token Service) metadata retrieval.
- Only the WS-Transfer/Get request is supported not the WS-MEX/GetMetadata request. This is interoperable with MEX-enabled WCF services.
Data Binding Status
Updated: October 29, 2008
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- All Data Binding functionality has been implemented.
Reliable Messaging Status
Updated: April 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
- n/a
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Make connection support
- Make connection annonymous URIs support in protocol messages
- Persistent RM sequences
- High availability support in RM
Security Status
Updated: April 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- Issue 1021 : validation of server side policy failed.
Known Issues
|
Interoperability Feature |
Status |
Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Issue 710 :
<sp:IncludeTimestamp> is a binding level assertion in
WS-SecurityPolicy. This prevents a clean approach to having some secure
and some non-secure methods in a WebService |
Scheduled for Metro 1.3
release. |
|
| Issue 715:
Security Failures in AIX when using TripleDES Algorithm |
Scheduled for Metro 1.5 release. | |
|
"" URI Reference not supported in Signature |
Need to support empty URI Reference in Signature Issue#269 |
Will be supported in a future release |
|
Returning of SOAP fault : Negative tests with Mismatched client and server policies |
SOAP Fault not returned: Different Algorithm suites used by Service Consumer/Provider. Issue#22 on IssueTracker |
Will be supported in a future release. |
|
EncryptedParts in SupportingTokens |
EncryptedParts in SupportingTokens assertion in message policy
does not work |
Need a clarification from the WS-SecurityPolicy Specification as to whether Encrypted Parts inside SupportingTokens makes sense. |
|
SecurityPolicy:sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/ |
SecurityPolicy:sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:SoapNormalization10
assertion causes deploy failure Issue#16 |
Feature Not Implemented |
|
SecurityPolicy: sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPath10 assertion |
SecurityPolicy: sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPath10 assertion causes deploy failure Issue#15 |
Feature Not Implemented |
|
SecurityPolicy: sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPathFilter20 assertion |
SecurityPolicy: sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPathFilter20 assertion causes deploy failure Issue#14 |
Feature Not Implemented |
| ProtectToken with X509Token and
RequireDerivedKeys |
The client is uanble to
generate the request soap message and the exception thrown is:
javax.xml.crypto.URIReferenceException:Issue#76 |
Will be fixed in a future
release. Note that WCF RTM does not support sp:ProtectTokens assertion |
| SamlToken as InitiatorToken in
AsymmetricBinding, with ProtectTokens fails with :: Could not find
Reference #5 under Signature with ID1 |
WSDL has AsymmetricBinding
(X509Token as Initiator and RecipientToken),SamlToken as
SignedSupportingToken.Request/Response messages are signed and
encrypted. The client side has a SamlCallbackHandler meant to populate
an SenderVouches saml assertion into the request message. The test
fails on the server side with the following exception trace :
Could not find ReferenceIssue#206 |
Will be fixed in a future
release. |
| Security with List data type
dropping xs namespace declaration |
Issue#971 | This issue is now fixed for Sign, and Sign + Encrypt scenario.
It issue still exists for plain Encryption scenario. The workaround should be to use Sign+Encrypt if encryption is required,
or use non-optimized security. |
| Security for JSR 109 WebServices does not work with V3-Prelude |
GlassFish V3 Prelude does not have WS-Security support for JSR 109 WebService |
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Multiple secure conversation tokens per message is not implemented. Only one secure conversation token per message is assumed.
- When using SecureConversation, WSIT does not support different
values for AlgorithmSuite assertion in the BootstrapPolicy and the
Application Policy. That means both the BootstrapPolicy and
ApplicationPolicy should use the same AlgorithmSuite.
- If a binary secret arrives in a SAML assertion, then implementation does not ensure that SSL was used for the Incoming Message.
- Implied DerivedKeys specified by a @wsc:nonce attribute on SecureTokenRequest is not supported in this release
- The @wsc:Instance attribute on wsse:Reference for referencing specific Secure Context Token instances is not supported in this release
- The Policy Verification for incoming messages is not capable of catching a Mismatch in AlgorithmSuite values between the Service Policy and the Policy used by the Client to secure the message (refer known Issue# 22)
- The Policy Verification for incoming messages is not capable
of catching a Mismatch in reference types used in Keyinfo
of Signature (for example if the server requires a KeyIdentifier, but
the incoming request makes use of Direct reference, then we do
not detect this). Part of the problem arises from the fact that the
<sp:Require*> does not entirely govern the reference type
actually used, the IncludeTokenPolicy on the Token overrides the
<sp:Require*>. This will be fixed in future releases.
- The SAML 2.0 API's supported by WSIT security has only a
placeholder for AuthnContextStatement implementation. This will be
fixed by adding an appropriate Constructor which takes necessary
arguments. Getters will also be provided to retrieve the
individual members.
-
The Following WS-SecurityPolicy Features from specification Draft:
Jul 2005 Ver 1.1 and WS-SecurityPolicy Version 1.2 are unsupported in this release of WSIT:
WS-SecurityPolicy
Specification
SectionAssertion
Remark
5.3.1
RequiredElements
Will be supported in a future release
6.1.1
TokenInclusion
includeTokenPolicy=Once is NOT supported, except for the case of Keberos Tokens where Once is the only supported value, Always, AlwaysToRecipient and Never are supported (refer known Issue# 19)
6.3.1
UsernameToken
Only <sp:UsernameToken10> is supported in this release, <sp:UsernameToken11> and Password Derived Keys will be supported in a future release
6.3.3
X509Token
Only <sp:WssX509V3Token10> is supported in this release.
The rest (<sp:WssX509V3Token11>, <sp:WssX509Pkcs7Token10>, <sp:WssX509Pkcs7Token11>,<sp:WssX509PkiPathV1Token10>, <sp:WssX509PkiPathV1Token11>, <sp:WssX509V1Token10>, <sp:WssX509V1Token11>) will be supported in a future release based on real-world usecases and customer preferences.6.3.9
RelToken
No Plan for supporting this token.
6.3.6
SecurityContextToken
No Plan for supporting this token
6.3.5
SpnegoContextToken
Will be supported in a future release
7.1/8.1
AlgorithmSuite
All algorithms are supported with the exception of algorithms under Asymmetric KeyWrap.
sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPathFilter20 assertion causes deploy failure (refer known Issue#14)
sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:XPath10 assertion causes deploy failure (refer known Issue #15)
sp:AlgorithmSuite/wsp:Policy/sp:SoapNormalization10 assertion causes deploy failure(refer known Issue#16)
7.5
Token Protection
Token Protection in cases where includeTokenPolicy="Never" or in cases where the Token is not in the Message, is not handled correctly yet (refer known Issue# 76, 206). Note that WCF RTM does not support sp:ProtectTokens assertion
9.2
SignedSupportingTokens
The runtime will not be able to sign the supporting token in cases where the Token is not in the Message (such as for includeTokenPolicy=Never/Once).
9.4
SignedEndorsingSupportingTokens
The runtime will not be able to sign the supporting token in cases where the Token is not in the Message (such as for includeTokenPolicy=Never/Once).
10.1
WSS10 Assertion
Everything is supported with the Exception of <sp:MustSupportRefEmbeddedToken>.
10.2
WSS11 Assertion
Everything is supported with the Exception of <sp:MustSupportRefEmbeddedToken>.
11.1
Trust10 Assertion
MustSupportClientChallenge, MustSupportServerChallenge are not supported in this release.
Secure Conversation Status
Updated: April 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- Issue 1051: Wrong KeyWrap algorithm for the secure conversation RSTR message
- Issue 1056: Infinite loop when processing a DerivedKeyToken with Generation elenment
Known issues
- None
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Client initiated security context
Trust Status
Updated: April 20, 2009
New in this release
- Allow MEX to work for STS with only common path
Fixed in this release
- Issue 1073: STS does not support TruststoreCBH
- Issue 1076: StackOverFlowError if secure conversation is enabled for both STS and the service
- Issue 1083: With Metro STS, STSAttributeProvider values is not taked in the issued token
Known issues
- None
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Token Cache and SSO
- Token Cancellation Protocol.
- Token Renewing Protocol
- Any profiles on top of Negotiation and Challenge Extensions
Coordination/Atomic Transactions Status
Updated: April 20, 2008
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
| Feature | Status/Workaround |
|---|---|
|
"WSTXServices" is listed as a deployed web service in the NetBeans 5.5.1 SJSAS admin interface (Runtime -> SJSAS -> Applications -> Web Applications) |
This isn't an issue, per se, just an FYI so users are not confused when they see the WS-TX system app listed in the NB UI. It is supposed to be hidden (and it is in NB 6). Users can attempt to undeploy the app, but the AS prevents this operation from happening. |
|
issue 717: Ejb web service deployment fails on AIX. |
Seeing this error during deployment of some TX SQE functional tests only on AIX:
|
|
issue 718: TX interop S->M on AIX, Error on HTTP request: 500 Internal Error. |
Seeing this error during TX interop S->M on AIX :
|
| Issue 723 |
There is a regression causing that TX context does not get initialized in certain cases. The PolicyMap that is parsed second time (from the WSDL) does not contain the same, correct data. There is a problem in marshalling Policy data into WSDL during WSDL creation. |
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- Transaction recovery
- Processing Transaction Attributes in EJB deployment descriptor
- WS-Atomic Transaction capabilities are not available in Tomcat web server with WSIT installed. WS-Atomic Transactions context can only flow from Web and EJB tier of Glassfish v2 Application Server.
- A JAX-WS 2.0/2.1, WSIT 1.0, Glassfish v2 Application client or a Tomcat hosted web service can invoke a transacted web service operation with policy assertion of <wsat:ATAssertion wsp:Optional=”true”/> since it is optional to flow a transactional context with the request. It is not possible to call a transacted web service operation with policy assertion of <wsat:ATAssertion> from any of the listed containers that do not support flowing a WS-Atomic Transaction context.
-
Optional protocol messages currently not implemented.
[WSCOOR2004] Section 3.1 Activation Service and [WSAT2004] Section 3.2 Completion Protocol
NetBeans WSIT Module Status
Updated: October 30, 2008
New in this release
- Support for .NET 3.5 / METRO 1.3+ configuration
Fixed in this release
Known issues
|
Feature |
Status/Workaround |
|---|---|
| Security settings are not supported with GlassFish v3 | Metro 1.5 does not yet support Security with JSR109 deployment on GlassFish v3, thus security settings in QoS dialog are not supported. The fix is targeted to METRO 1.5 release. |
| To enable Microsoft WCF <-> Java interoperability, an 'action=operationName' attribute needs to be specified on each operation. | The sample code should look like this:
@WebMethod(action=myOperation)
public String myOperation() {
return "";
)
|
| Package rename refactoring does not modify WSIT configuration file name | When renaming a package that contains a web service class, the WSIT config file is not renamed accordingly. As a work-around, you can manually change the name of the configuration file under the Web Pages->WEB-INF node to wsit.<newpkgname>.xml. See NetBeans issue 105287 |
| Web Service Client creation does not work properly with Deploy on Save feature | NetBeans 6.5 introduced new feature "Deploy on Save" which speeds up development in a way that you don't need to manually deploy your application after changes have been made. This feature currently clashes with web service deployment. Workaround is to turn this feature off. To do that, switch off the "Deploy on Change" feature in Web application -> Project properties -> Run section. For more information see: NetBeans issue 141291 |
Policy Status
Updated: Apr 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
Known issues
- Policy does not set webservice features until WSDL generation
- First element check when unmarshalling policy expression too strict
- Policy error check should produce line number and system ID
- Policy core does n't allow to write policy assertions in compact form
- validate policy assertions on client
- WSIT .xml file parsing is intolerably fussy with valid white space
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- The WS-Policy implementation is feature-complete.
Security Policy Status
Updated: April 20, 2009
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
|
Interoperability Feature |
Status/Workaround |
|---|---|
|
SupportingTokens assertion |
EncryptedParts in SupportingTokens assertion in message policy does not work |
|
The following security policy assertions cause a deploy failure:
|
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- XPathFilter
- RequiredElements
- SoapNormalization10
- Automatic Use of https URL's for endpoints when TransportBinding assertion is present.
SOAP/TCP Status
Updated: April 20, 2008
New in this release
- n/a
Fixed in this release
- n/a
Known issues
- None.
Feature requests not implemented in this release
- The SOAP/TCP implementation is feature-complete.
